The Shooting of Charlie Kirk Book Real or Fake | News Check

After the shocking shooting of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, rumors quickly spread online about a strange book. Social media users claimed that a book titled The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America’s Response appeared on Amazon a day before the tragedy.

This led to widespread questions: Was the book real? Did someone know about the attack before it happened? Or was it just a hoax?

What People Claimed

  • A book listing showed up on Amazon with a September 9, 2025 release date—one day before Charlie Kirk was shot.
  • The supposed author was “Anastasia J. Casey,” an unknown writer.
  • Screenshots of the listing went viral, fueling conspiracy theories.

What Fact-Checkers Found

Trusted sources investigated the claims and found a different story:

  • Snopes confirmed the claim was false. The book did not appear on Amazon before the shooting.
  • Amazon explained that the early date was a clerical error, not proof of advance knowledge.
  • The author, Anastasia J. Casey, does not have any verified background or history as a real writer.
  • Experts believe the book may have been AI-generated or rushed after the event to make money from the tragedy.

Truth Behind the Rumor

Here’s what we know for sure:

  • The shooting of Charlie Kirk happened on September 10, 2025.
  • The book listing with a September 9 date was not actually live before the attack—it was an error.
  • There is no evidence of a conspiracy or prior knowledge of the shooting.

In short : the shooting of Charlie Kirk book is not real in the way social media suggested. The timing confusion came from a listing mistake and the rise of low-quality, fast-generated online books.

The Shooting of Charlie Kirk Book Real or Fake?

The claim that a book about Charlie Kirk’s shooting was published before the event is fake. The listing was an error, and the supposed author is unverified. While the book may exist in some form, it is not proof of any conspiracy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *